This series, Anaphora, continues key themes found in my previous work: the tensions between thinking and feeling,
between symmetry and asymmetry, and between order and chaos.
The ostensible subjects of these photographs are wires - ordinary electric and telephone wires that
most photographers studiously work to avoid in their photographs.
At one level, wires are a symbol of technology and sleek cold geometry, the
ultimate of intellectual simplicity and rigor. They keep some of that austere simplicity in my photographs, which lends a serene and
meditative aura.
However, in the context of these photographs the wires and lines carry a wide range of other meanings as well. Like in Barnett Newman's work, I use
variations of thick and thin lines, bold and tenuous, ragged and strident, dense and sparse, and central and marginalized, and each of these
variations bring up different assocations for us. I also vary the orientation of the lines, using
the horizontal and diagonal lines, as well has vertical ones. I am fascinated by the different connotations that the orientation can
convey: horizontal lines can be expansive, all-encompassing, and anchoring, but they can also be layers of history or
a tomb (as in Rothko's work) ; diagonal lines can be dynamic and energetic (as in Richard Diebenkorn's work), but they can also be
domineering or unbalancing; vertical lines can be life-affirming rays of energy (as for Newman), or they can be rigid and blocking.
While most of my previous work is in a square format, I was drawn to elongated compositions for this work, particularly long horizontals,
and to a monumental scale. For now, they are printed at 24" x 60" (with some longer ones ranging up to 24" x 75"). Part of the inspiration
for this shift to monumental horizontal works comes from Barnett Newman - I was blown away by his Vir Heroicus Sublimis at MOMA when I saw
it last year. When faced with a work of that size and shape, you can't take the whole work in at the same time, so it introduces a new
dimension of temporality and seriality, which goes well with the rhythmic nature of the work itself. Another source of inspiration for
this series came from Ellsworth Kelly, both for his creative use of rhythmic repetition (as in Cite), and for his use of diagonals (as in
La Combe III and Ormesson). My use of asymmetric, marginal compositions was originally inspired by Harry Callahan, and I also share
his love of understated subtleties of expression. Franz Kline's paintings have also managed to find their way into this series - there are echoes
of Ravenna in my Anaphora #43, for example.
As for the title of the series, the word anaphora comes from the Greek meaning "carrying back" or "referring". Anaphora is a pointing, a gesture, a proxy standing in for
something absent. When faced with the ineffable, the best road to understanding sometimes lies in metaphors. Mysteries left as an exercise for the reader,
footprints, echos, unknowns pointing to the yet greater unknown.
In Linguistics, anaphora is the process of referring to things by means of words like pronouns. He, she, it, myself, them...
They are magical creatures, these anaphors. Lifeless until we breathe life into them. It, it, it. What is it? Nothing, until you make it something.
Then, behold! It contains a universe, requiring only the slightest touch of thought to release it. Then it is bursting with life, until we
casually let it slip from our fingers and forget it. Then it deflates and returns to its former existence as a limp little word,
stripped naked until we need it again.
In the same way, the simplest line, defined by two bare points, is gesture stripped to its most basic. But brush against it, graze it with your
finger, set it on its way with a breath, and it comes alive. It might explode with indomitable energy, or skitter away tenuously.
It is whatever you want it to be. Then do the same to some of the line's brethren- bring three more to life, or three hundred.
They can march to war, or sit down to contemplate the omphalos. The universe is waiting to be created...
The photographs were captured on negatives using my Hasselblad camera, then
scanned into the computer and manipulated digitally, then meticulously recreated in vector form, printed digitally using archival pigment inks,
and mounted on aluminum sheets. Some of the images look just like straight darkroom prints of their negatives
(for example, Anaphora #57), while others use elements from various different negatives. That type of work is simply not possible in
the darkroom or using multiple exposures (and believe me, I tried!), so I had to go digital.
This new method allows me to give a new solution to the challenge of how to get abstract work out of an inherently representational medium.
Before, I had always relied on finding subjects with exactly the right form, setting, light, size, etc. Sometimes it's tough to find something
that matches what you're trying to say (or to decide what to say based on what you find). That is why I had taken up oil painting - there are no
restrictions on what you can put on the canvas. However, I can get the best of both worlds by using digital photography. By combining elements
of various pictures together, I'm basically painting with photographs, and that allows me to create all the universes I want.